论文已发表
提 交 论 文
注册即可获取Ebpay生命的最新动态
注 册
IF 收录期刊
Authors Guo Y, Li J, Zhang P, Zhang Y
Received 28 August 2015
Accepted for publication 9 August 2016
Published 6 January 2017 Volume 2017:10 Pages 177—184
DOI http://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S95322
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewers approved by Dr Colin Mak
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Professor Min Li
Purpose: To investigate the correlations in target volumes based on 18F-FDG PET/CT and
four-dimensional CT (4DCT) to detect the feasibility of implementing PET in
determining gross target volumes (GTV) for tumor motion for primary thoracic
esophageal cancer (EC).
Methods: Thirty-three patients with EC sequentially underwent
contrast-enhanced 3DCT, 4DCT, and 18F-FDG PET-CT thoracic simulation. The internal
gross target volume (IGTV)10 was obtained by combining the GTV from
ten phases of 4DCT. The GTVs based on PET/CT images were defined by setting of
different standardized uptake value thresholds and visual contouring. The
difference in volume ratio, conformity index (CI), and degree of inclusion (DI)
between IGTV10 and
GTVPET was
compared.
Results: The images from 20 patients were suitable for further
analysis. The optimal volume ratio of 0.95±0.32, 1.06±0.50, 1.07±0.49 was at
standardized uptake value (SUV)2.5, SUV20%, or manual contouring. The mean CIs were from 0.33
to 0.54. The best CI was at SUV2.0 (0.51±0.11), SUV2.5 (0.53±0.13), SUV20% (0.53±0.12), and manual contouring
(0.54±0.14). The mean DIs of GTVPET in IGTV10 were from 0.60 to 0.90, and the mean
DI of IGTV10 in
GTVPET ranged
from 0.35 to 0.78. A negative correlation was found between the mean CI and
different SUV (P =0.000).
Conclusion: None of the PET-based contours had both close spatial
and volumetric approximation to the 4DCT IGTV10. Further
evaluation and optimization of PET as a tool for target identification are
required.
Keywords: esophageal
cancer, 18F-FDG PET/CT, four-dimensional computed tomography,
contour, tumor motion