论文已发表
提 交 论 文
注册即可获取Ebpay生命的最新动态
注 册
IF 收录期刊
Authors Zhao H, Yang H, Han K, Xu J, Yao F, Zhao Y, Fan L, Gu H, Shen Z
Received 21 September 2016
Accepted for publication 9 November 2016
Published 10 January 2017 Volume 2017:10 Pages 295—302
DOI http://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S122908
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewers approved by Dr Jia Fan
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Yao Dai
Background: The incidence of adenocarcinomas as multiple primary lung cancers
(MPLCs) is increasing. How to determine the treatment strategies of MPLCs,
especially second primary lung adenocarcinomas (SPLACs), and the prognostic
factors associated with it are unclear.
Methods: The clinical records of patients undergoing surgery
for second adenocarcinomas based on Martini–Melamed criteria between 2001 and
2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Survival rates were calculated by the
Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis
was conducted using the Cox proportional hazards model.
Results: A total of 115 patients with SPLACs were identified
based on Martini–Melamed criteria. With respect to the second resections, three
subgroups with low- (adenocarcinoma in situ, n=6; minimally invasive
adenocarcinoma, n=19), intermediate- (lepidic, n=9; acinar, n=40; papillary,
n=23), and high-grades (solid, n=9; micropapillary, n=2; invasive mucinous,
n=7) were assigned. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates from the time of the
first and the second resections were 86.5% and 69.5%, respectively. Cox multivariate
analysis identified computed tomography (CT) morphology of SPLACs (ground glass
opacity predominant versus solid predominant; hazard ratio [HR]=0.42; P =0.036),
histologic classification (same/similar vs different; HR=0.06; P <0.001),
pathologic stage of the primary (stage I vs II; HR=0.20; P =0.015) and second
tumors (stage I vs IIIa; HR=0.21; P =0.002), and histologic grade of
SPLACs (low- vs high-grade, HR=0.05, P =0.016; intermediate- vs
high-grade, HR=0.37, P =0.027) as significantly
favorable prognostic factors for OS.
Conclusion: In addition to pathologic stage of the initial tumors
and histologic classification, pathologic stage and CT morphology of SPLACs
were identified as predictors of survival. The histologic grade of SPLACs based
on the new adenocarcinoma classification could provide additional prognostic
information.
Keywords: multiple primary lung cancer,
metachronous, adenocarcinoma