论文已发表
提 交 论 文
注册即可获取Ebpay生命的最新动态
注 册
IF 收录期刊
治疗中断对白介素(IL)-17A 抑制剂治疗斑块状银屑病疗效的影响:一项回顾性分析
Authors Jiang J, Zhang M, Li M
Received 2 January 2025
Accepted for publication 14 March 2025
Published 26 March 2025 Volume 2025:18 Pages 1681—1690
DOI http://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S515389
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 3
Editor who approved publication: Dr Woon-Man Kung
Jin Jiang,1 Meihua Zhang,2 Mi Li1
1Department of Dermatology, Liyang People’s Hospital, Liyang, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Dermatology, Jiangsu Provincial People’s Hospital, Nanjing, People’s Republic of China
Correspondence: Mi Li, Department of Dermatology, Liyang People’s Hospital, 70 Jianshe West Road, Liyang, Changzhou, Jiangsu, 213300, People’s Republic of China, Email limicherry159009@163.com
Background: Plaque psoriasis is a chronic, recurrent, immune-mediated inflammatory skin disease. This study aimed to investigate effectiveness of interleukin (IL)-17A inhibitor treatment and effectiveness after treatment interruption in plaque psoriasis patients and analyze the related factors.
Methods: This study retrospectively collected clinical characteristics and related treatment status of plaque psoriasis patients treated with IL-17A inhibitors, and evaluated the treatment effectiveness, reasons for treatment interruption, effectiveness after treatment interruption, and risk factors affecting treatment effectiveness.
Results: This study ultimately included 106 patients with plaque psoriasis, including 61 males (57.55%) and 45 females (42.45%), aged 41.0 (31.0– 54.0) years and with a disease duration of 12.0 (8.0– 20.0) months. Among them, 71 cases (67%) achieved PASI90 after receiving IL-17A inhibitor treatment, and 35 cases (33.02%) achieved PASI75. A total of 50 patients (50/106, 47.17%) interrupted treatment, 23 patients (23/50, 46%) maintained a therapeutic effect of PASI90 or above, and 27 patients (27/50, 54%) had a therapeutic effect lower than PASI75, with median time of treatment interruption of 1.0 (1.0– 3.5) months. Univariate analysis findings showed that duration of IL-17A inhibitor treatment interruption and reasons for interruption had significant statistical significance on treatment effectiveness (all P< 0.05). In multivariate analysis, treatment interruption (OR=7.154, 95% CI: 2.528– 20.24) and reasons such as stress/anxiety (OR: 14.889, 95% CI: 1.160– 23.480) were risk factors affecting treatment effectiveness.
Conclusion: Interleukin (IL)-17A inhibitor treatment interruption plays critical effects on the treatment of plaque psoriasis. Early and long-term adherence to IL-17A inhibitor treatment can control the course of the disease and improve the long-term health of psoriasis patients.
Keywords: plaque psoriasis, interleukin (IL)-17A inhibitors, interrupt, COVID-19 pandemic, treatment outcomes