论文已发表
提 交 论 文
注册即可获取Ebpay生命的最新动态
注 册
IF 收录期刊
膝上神经阻滞中,神经周围注射地塞米松比注射右美托咪定更有效延长坐骨神经和隐神经阻滞时间:一项单中心、前瞻性、双盲、随机对照试验
Authors Lei G, Wu L, Yin Y, Zhang S, Wang G
Received 30 January 2025
Accepted for publication 18 April 2025
Published 7 May 2025 Volume 2025:18 Pages 27—38
DOI http://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S515510
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 3
Editor who approved publication: Dr Stefan Wirz
Guiyu Lei,1 Lili Wu,1 Yue Yin,1 Shu Zhang,2 Guyan Wang1
1Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100730, People’s Republic of China; 2Center of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
Correspondence: Guyan Wang, Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 1 Dongjiaomingxiang, Beijing, 100730, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86-13910985139, Email guyanwang2006@163.com
Purpose: This study aims to assess and compare the effectiveness of perineural dexamethasone (DEX) and perineural dexmedetomidine (DEM) as adjuvant in popliteal sciatic and saphenous nerve blocks, focusing on the duration of analgesia and side effects following major foot and ankle surgeries.
Patients and Methods: Ninety patients scheduled for major foot and ankle surgeries under general anesthesia, who received popliteal sciatic and saphenous nerve blocks, were randomly assigned to one of three groups: (1) control group receiving 0.375% ropivacaine; (2) DEX group receiving 0.375% ropivacaine combined with 10 mg perineural dexamethasone; (3) DEM group receiving 0.375% ropivacaine combined with 0.75 μg/kg perineural dexmedetomidine. The primary outcome measured was the duration of analgesia, defined as the time from the administration of the nerve block to the onset of the first pain sensation in the surgical area. Secondary outcomes included opioid consumption within the first 48 hours post-surgery and the incidence of side effects such as hypotension and bradycardia. (Clinical trial registration number: ChiCTR2100048127).
Results: The time until the first perception of pain was significantly extended in the DEX group (28.0 (3.3) hours) compared to the DEM group (24.1 (1.3) hours) and the control group (17.5 (3.5) hours, P< 0.001). Additionally, opioid consumption within the first 24 hours was markedly reduced in both the DEX and DEM groups compared to the control group (P< 0.001). However, opioid usage between 0 to 48 hours post-surgery showed no significant differences among the three groups. The DEM group experienced a higher incidence of hypotension and bradycardia compared to both the DEX and control group (P< 0.001).
Conclusion: Both 10 mg dexamethasone and 0.75 μg/kg dexmedetomidine effectively prolonged analgesia in patients undergoing major foot and ankle surgery with a popliteal sciatic and saphenous nerve block. However, dexamethasone (10 mg) provided a significantly longer duration of analgesia compared to dexmedetomidine (0.75 μg/kg).
Trial Registration: Chictr.org.cn identifier: ChiCTR2100048127.
Keywords: foot and ankle surgery, nerve block, dexamethasone, dexmedetomidine