论文已发表
提 交 论 文
注册即可获取Ebpay生命的最新动态
注 册
IF 收录期刊
阿普米司特和氘可来昔替尼治疗银屑病相关不良事件:基于 FAERS 数据库的药物警戒研究
Authors Xu Y , Liu X , Guo L , Jiang X
Received 23 February 2025
Accepted for publication 12 April 2025
Published 5 May 2025 Volume 2025:18 Pages 1121—1135
DOI http://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S439643
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Jeffrey Weinberg
Yuanyuan Xu,1,2,* Xinjin Liu,1,2,* Linghong Guo,1,2 Xian Jiang1,2
1Department of Dermatology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, People’s Republic of China; 2Laboratory of Dermatology, Clinical Institute of Inflammation and Immunology, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-Related Molecular Network, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, People’s Republic of China
*These authors contributed equally to this work
Correspondence: Linghong Guo, Email linhom.guo@foxmail.com Xian Jiang, Email jiangxian@scu.edu.cn
Introduction: Apremilast and deucravacitinib are oral small-molecule inhibitors approved for the treatment of psoriasis, each with the potential to fill unmet needs among psoriasis patients. Investigating their adverse event (AE) profiles with post-marketing data is essential for optimizing patient care.
Methods: We analyzed AE reports from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database during Q1 2014 to Q4 2023. Disproportionality and Bayesian analyses were utilized to compare safety signals.
Results: A total of 95,524 and 754 AE reports associated with apremilast and deucravacitinib were retrieved, respectively. Apremilast was more prevalent to cause gastrointestinal AEs such as diarrhea and nausea, as well as psoriasis recurrence and nervous system disorders like headache. Deucravacitinib showed stronger associations with cutaneous AEs, including acne, folliculitis, pruritus, rash, and erythema, along with oral conditions. AEs not previously documented on drug labels, such as sinus headache and multiple allergies for apremilast, and acneiform dermatitis and rosacea for deucravacitinib, were identified. Female patients were exposed to a higher risk for skin-related AEs when using deucravacitinib.
Conclusion: Our study offers valuable real-world insights into the safety profiles of apremilast and deucravacitinib. The observed sex differences in adverse events associated with apremilast and deucravacitinib require further investigation in real-world and clinical settings.
Keywords: apremilast, deucravacitinib, pharmacovigilance analysis, safety signals, adverse events, psoriasis