论文已发表
提 交 论 文
注册即可获取Ebpay生命的最新动态
注 册
IF 收录期刊
江苏省医院骨科专科护理实践的横断面研究
Authors Song H , Yin X , Xu J, Yang J, Gu Z
Received 17 January 2025
Accepted for publication 28 April 2025
Published 2 May 2025 Volume 2025:18 Pages 2481—2495
DOI http://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S517934
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 3
Editor who approved publication: Professor Charles Victor Pollack
Haiyan Song,1 Xuwen Yin,1 Jiayi Xu,2 Jing Yang,1 Zejuan Gu1,3
1School of Nursing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, People’s Republic of China; 2Suzhou Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210029, People’s Republic of China
Correspondence: Zejuan Gu, Department of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Province Hospital, 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210029, People’s Republic of China, Email jassicagu@163.com
Purpose: To evaluate the development status of orthopedic specialty nursing in hospitals in Jiangsu Province in China.
Patients and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted from August to September 2024 in the orthopedics departments of secondary and tertiary hospitals in Jiangsu Province, China. Data were collected using a self-designed questionnaire administered through the online platform Wenjuan Xing. Moreover, data on specialty nursing techniques and specialty quality indicators were collected. The Pearson’s chi-square test and Mann–Whitney U-test were used to identify the differences between the different types and sizes of hospitals.
Results: Data analysis involved 229 hospitals. Nurse-led clinics (8.30%) were the least used format of orthopedic specialty nursing, and there were significant differences in different sizes of hospitals (P< 0.001). The most commonly implemented specialty nursing technique was coordination and nursing of bone traction (79.23%). Concerning the measures to guarantee the quality of specialty nursing, the nursing ward round was the most common, and there were significant differences in different sizes of hospitals about “specialty nursing goals or evaluation indicators to be developed” (P< 0.001). 88.21% of the hospitals regularly provided specialized nursing training to nurses, and only 29.26% of hospitals set up specialist nurse positions. Only 90.83% of hospitals regularly monitored, analyzed, and there were significant differences in the improvement of quality through “clinical research” in hospitals of different sizes (P< 0.001). Specialty nursing activities conducted by nurses were mainly related to performance assessment (73.80%). The standardized prevention rate of venous thromboembolism (62.31%) was the most frequently used indicator. Concerning obstacles to implementing orthopedic specialty nursing, 82.53% of the orthopedic departments expressed dissatisfaction over a lack of nurses.
Conclusion: Hospital managers and policymakers should support the growth of orthopedic specialty nursing, hire more nurses and specialist nurses, address the obstacles of evaluation and incentive mechanisms of orthopedic nurses, and investigate additional strategies for the field’s advancement.
Keywords: orthopedic, current situation, specialty nursing, hospitals