Ebpay生命医药出版社


  • Ebpay生命

    100763

    论文已发表

    提 交 论 文


    注册即可获取Ebpay生命的最新动态

    注 册



    IF 收录期刊



    • 3.3 Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)
    • 3.4 Clin Epidemiol
    • 2.5 Cancer Manag Res
    • 2.9 Infect Drug Resist
    • 3.5 Clin Interv Aging
    • 4.7 Drug Des Dev Ther
    • 2.7 Int J Chronic Obstr
    • 6.6 Int J Nanomed
    • 2.5 Int J Women's Health
    • 2.5 Neuropsych Dis Treat
    • 2.7 OncoTargets Ther
    • 2.0 Patient Prefer Adher
    • 2.3 Ther Clin Risk Manag
    • 2.5 J Pain Res
    • 2.8 Diabet Metab Synd Ob
    • 2.8 Psychol Res Behav Ma
    • 3.0 Nat Sci Sleep
    • 1.8 Pharmgenomics Pers Med
    • 2.7 Risk Manag Healthc Policy
    • 4.2 J Inflamm Res
    • 2.1 Int J Gen Med
    • 4.2 J Hepatocell Carcinoma
    • 3.7 J Asthma Allergy
    • 1.9 Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol
    • 2.7 J Multidiscip Healthc



    更多详情 >>





    已发表论文

    循环 VEGF 被用作卵巢癌诊断的生物标志物：系统回顾和汇总分析

     

    Authors Liang B, He Q, Zhong L, Wang S, Pan Z, Wang T, Zhao Y

    Published Date May 2015 Volume 2015:8 Pages 1075—1082

    DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S83616

    Received 27 February 2015, Accepted 31 March 2015, Published 15 May 2015

    Abstract: VEGF is a frequently studied angiogenic factor in ovarian cancer (OC), and is considered to have an important role in the progression of OC. However, its diagnostic value has not been widely accepted because the conclusions are inconsistent and even conflicting. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic value of VEGF in OC. A systematic literature search was conducted using the PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, and WANFANG databases for relevant published articles (the last search update was November 18, 2014). The diagnosis sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, and the summary receiver operating characteristic curves were pooled by Meta DiSc 1.4 software. A total of ten studies with 1,131 subjects were finally included in this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, and summary receiver operating characteristic curves were 0.67 (0.63–0.73), 0.78 (0.75–0.81), 3.08 (6.36–12.22), 0.39 (0.29–0.51), 9.10 (5.43–45.25), and 0.8175, respectively. Furthermore, to explore the sources of heterogeneity, we conducted subgroup analyses based on ethnicity and sample size. The diagnostic accuracy of VEGF was higher in an Asian population than in a Caucasian population. A similar finding was found in subgroups with the smaller sample size (<100 subjects). In conclusion, the present meta-analysis suggests that VEGF has moderate diagnostic accuracy for OC. Considering our limitations and the heterogeneity among our selected studies, larger, well-designed prospective and multicenter validation studies are needed to evaluate the diagnostic value of serum VEGF for OC.
    Keywords: gynecological tumor, diagnosis, blood, review






    Download Article[PDF]